|
|
Try using paraFoam. |
|
|
|
paraFoam is not an alternative (e.g. due to headless installation and required functionalities from ParaView version 5.9). However attached patch should fix the issue.
prghEntrainment.patch (639 bytes)
diff --git a/src/finiteVolume/fields/fvPatchFields/derived/PrghPressure/PrghPressureFvPatchScalarField.C b/src/finiteVolume/fields/fvPatchFields/derived/PrghPressure/PrghPressureFvPatchScalarField.C
index ea4289102..23576ce41 100644
--- a/src/finiteVolume/fields/fvPatchFields/derived/PrghPressure/PrghPressureFvPatchScalarField.C
+++ b/src/finiteVolume/fields/fvPatchFields/derived/PrghPressure/PrghPressureFvPatchScalarField.C
@@ -125,7 +125,6 @@ void Foam::PrghPressureFvPatchScalarField<PressureFvPatchScalarField>::
write(Ostream& os) const
{
PressureFvPatchScalarField::write(os);
- writeEntry(os, "rho", rhoName_);
}
|
|
|
henry
2021-04-08 15:26
manager
~0011967
Last edited: 2021-04-08 15:27
|
The bug is in the paraview reader, you will need to report the issue to the maintainers of that reader if you do not want to use the reader we provide and maintain.
The patch you have provided will break other patch fields using PrghPressureFvPatchScalarField, what testing have you done on it?
|
|
|
|
You can use the reader we provide with ParaView version 5.9 but we don't recommend using this version of ParaView due to some serious bugs in it. |
|
|
|
I have tested on the DTCHullMoving tutorial. |
|
|
|
That is not sufficient testing, you will need to test ALL the patch fields based on PrghPressureFvPatchScalarField. |
|
|
|
I tested the paraFoam reader with ParaView version 5.9 on the DTCHullMoving case and there were no problems. |
|
