View Issue Details

Jump to NotesJump to History
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0003409OpenFOAMBugpublic2019-12-09 08:392019-12-13 08:18
Reportertniemi Assigned Tohenry  
PrioritynormalSeverityminorReproducibilityalways
Status resolvedResolutionfixed 
Product Versiondev 
Fixed in Versiondev 
Summary0003409: Regression bug in Ensight part
DescriptionIn commit (https://github.com/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-dev/commit/409548cbccac26e5c9632d2543505f659da58945)

"os.writeKeyword" was replaced with "writeKeyword(os, ..)" and I assume this was made with search&replace with the assumption that os is a regular OStream. However, in some Ensight-related files os is "ensightGeoFile" or "ensightFile", which have their own specializations of writeKeyword (=write + add newline + some additional logic). The commit makes them use the regular writeKeyword which produces invalid files due to missing newline.

I have attached a diff-file which simply reverses the changes in the affected files.
TagsNo tags attached.

Activities

tniemi

2019-12-09 08:39

reporter  

patch.diff (3,592 bytes)    
diff --git a/src/conversion/ensight/part/ensightPartCells.C b/src/conversion/ensight/part/ensightPartCells.C
index d079cb9..17b386c 100644
--- a/src/conversion/ensight/part/ensightPartCells.C
+++ b/src/conversion/ensight/part/ensightPartCells.C
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ void Foam::ensightPartCells::writeConnectivity
     const labelUList& pointMap
 ) const
 {
-    writeKeyword(os, key);
+    os.writeKeyword(key);
     os.write(idList.size());
     os.newline();
 
diff --git a/src/conversion/ensight/part/ensightPartFaces.C b/src/conversion/ensight/part/ensightPartFaces.C
index ed03f68..7423e5d 100644
--- a/src/conversion/ensight/part/ensightPartFaces.C
+++ b/src/conversion/ensight/part/ensightPartFaces.C
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ void Foam::ensightPartFaces::writeConnectivity
     const labelUList& pointMap
 ) const
 {
-    writeKeyword(os, key);
+    os.writeKeyword(key);
     os.write(idList.size());
     os.newline();
 
diff --git a/src/conversion/ensight/part/ensightPartIO.C b/src/conversion/ensight/part/ensightPartIO.C
index e1e4b35..049a188 100644
--- a/src/conversion/ensight/part/ensightPartIO.C
+++ b/src/conversion/ensight/part/ensightPartIO.C
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ void Foam::ensightPart::writeGeometry
         writeHeader(os, true);
 
         // write points
-        writeKeyword(os, "coordinates");
+        os.writeKeyword("coordinates");
         os.write(ptList.nPoints);
         os.newline();
 
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ void Foam::ensightPart::writeScalarField
 
         if (perNode)
         {
-            writeKeyword(os, "coordinates");
+            os.writeKeyword("coordinates");
             writeFieldList(os, field, labelUList::null());
         }
         else
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ void Foam::ensightPart::writeScalarField
 
                 if (idList.size())
                 {
-                    writeKeyword(os, elementTypes()[elemI]);
+                    os.writeKeyword(elementTypes()[elemI]);
                     writeFieldList(os, field, idList);
                 }
             }
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ void Foam::ensightPart::writeVectorField
 
         if (perNode)
         {
-            writeKeyword(os, "coordinates");
+            os.writeKeyword("coordinates");
             writeFieldList(os, field0, labelUList::null());
             writeFieldList(os, field1, labelUList::null());
             writeFieldList(os, field2, labelUList::null());
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ void Foam::ensightPart::writeVectorField
 
                 if (idList.size())
                 {
-                    writeKeyword(os, elementTypes()[elemI]);
+                    os.writeKeyword(elementTypes()[elemI]);
                     writeFieldList(os, field0, idList);
                     writeFieldList(os, field1, idList);
                     writeFieldList(os, field2, idList);
diff --git a/src/conversion/ensight/part/ensightPartTemplates.C b/src/conversion/ensight/part/ensightPartTemplates.C
index e2a6200..7b094f4 100644
--- a/src/conversion/ensight/part/ensightPartTemplates.C
+++ b/src/conversion/ensight/part/ensightPartTemplates.C
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ void Foam::ensightPart::writeField
 
         if (perNode)
         {
-            writeKeyword(os, "coordinates");
+            os.writeKeyword("coordinates");
             for
             (
                 direction cmpt=0;
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ void Foam::ensightPart::writeField
 
                 if (idList.size())
                 {
-                    writeKeyword(os, elementTypes()[elemI]);
+                    os.writeKeyword(elementTypes()[elemI]);
 
                     for
                     (
patch.diff (3,592 bytes)   

henry

2019-12-10 09:58

manager   ~0010975

Is the EnSight converter still needed? My understanding is that EnSight is now released with an OpenFOAM reader, can we now drop the reader and converter supplied with OpenFOAM?

tniemi

2019-12-10 11:12

reporter   ~0010977

Well, I don't know about the EnSight software, but I have found the EnSight format to be better than VTK for sampled surfaces. ParaView can read EnSight and the format allows to store mesh in a separate file, which combined with binary writing can reduce disk space usage by a huge fraction compared to (legacy) VTK-files where each time step must have a copy of the surface mesh.

henry

2019-12-12 13:09

manager   ~0010979

resolved by commit 52255e53a7a983995aa2e27b64b8fcc3399d15b6

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2019-12-09 08:39 tniemi New Issue
2019-12-09 08:39 tniemi File Added: patch.diff
2019-12-10 09:58 henry Note Added: 0010975
2019-12-10 11:12 tniemi Note Added: 0010977
2019-12-12 13:09 henry Assigned To => henry
2019-12-12 13:09 henry Status new => resolved
2019-12-12 13:09 henry Resolution open => fixed
2019-12-12 13:09 henry Fixed in Version => dev
2019-12-12 13:09 henry Note Added: 0010979