View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0003073OpenFOAMBugpublic2018-09-20 11:38
ReporterTaihang Assigned Tohenry  
PrioritynormalSeveritymajorReproducibilityalways
Status closedResolutionno change required 
PlatformGNU/LinuxOSUbuntuOS Version16.04
Summary0003073: kOmegaSSTDES model converged to unphysical result
DescriptionI was using kOmegaSSTDES turbulence model to run a simulation at deltaT = 0.000002. The max Courant number is less than 0.01, but the result is clearly unphysical. I then decreased deltaT to 0.000001. The result is much better but the time cost is increased. I was looking for the reason so I changed the turbulence model to dynamicKEqn with deltaT = 0.000002. the converged result is also physical. It seems that there is a problem with the kOmegaSSTDES turbulence model, which will result in unphysical result unless we limit the deltaT less than 0.000001. I am wondering if there is something wrong with my case or kOmegaSSTDES model. My case files have been attached.

There are three sets of result figures in my file. Result 1 corresponds to kOmegaSSTDES with deltaT = 0.000002, which is the unphysical result. Result 2 is kOmegaSSTDES with deltaT = 0.000001. Result 3 is dynamicKEqn with deltaT = 0.000002.
Steps To ReproduceTo reproduce result 1, you can use the following command in my file folder
decomposePar
mpirun -np 8 pimpleFoam -parallel
paraFoam -builtin

To reproduce result 2, please change the deltaT in controlDict to 0.000001, then
decomposePar -force
mpirun -np 8 pimpleFoam -parallel
paraFoam -builtin

To reproduce result 3, please change the deltaT in controlDict to 0.000002, and change the turbulenceProperties to dynamicKEqn, then
decomposePar -force
mpirun -np 8 pimpleFoam -parallel
paraFoam -builtin
TagsNo tags attached.

Activities

Taihang

2018-09-17 19:38

reporter  

SST_2D3.zip (416,698 bytes)

henry

2018-09-17 19:49

manager   ~0010062

We have also seen problem with the behavior of the k omega SST DES model and do not recommend it.

wwzhao

2018-09-19 06:50

reporter   ~0010063

Hi, I think you should not use DES for 2D case. Because the spanwise grid spacing will greatly dominate the solution by effecting delta (in your case you use maxDeltaxyz).

2D simulation with DES is also not recommended by Philippe Spalart, as stated in his presentation entitled "THE USES OF DES: NATURAL, EXTENDED, AND IMPROPER" at the DESider conference.

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2018-09-17 19:38 Taihang New Issue
2018-09-17 19:38 Taihang File Added: SST_2D3.zip
2018-09-17 19:49 henry Note Added: 0010062
2018-09-19 06:50 wwzhao Note Added: 0010063
2018-09-20 11:38 henry Assigned To => henry
2018-09-20 11:38 henry Status new => closed
2018-09-20 11:38 henry Resolution open => no change required