View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0002629 | OpenFOAM | Bug | public | 2017-07-20 20:09 | 2018-07-10 11:23 |
| Reporter | karlvirgil | Assigned To | henry | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Platform | Linux | OS | Centos | OS Version | 7 |
| Product Version | dev | ||||
| Fixed in Version | dev | ||||
| Summary | 0002629: thin-film boundary condition accuracy | ||||
| Description | In the thin film boundary condition file inclinedFilmNusseltInletVelocityFvPatchVectorField.C, the values of 0.333 and 0.666 are used for 1/3 and 2/3, respectively. When trying to make exact comparisons to the analytical expression for model verification, it is helpful to have higher precision on these two values. Thus, 175 operator==(n*pow(gTan*mup/(3.0*rhop), 0.333)*pow(Re, 0.666)); should be replaced by 175 operator==(n*pow(gTan*mup/(3.0*rhop), 1.0/3.0)*pow(Re, 2.0/3.0)); | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-20 20:09 | karlvirgil | New Issue | |
| 2017-07-20 20:09 | karlvirgil | Tag Attached: thin-film model | |
| 2017-07-21 17:40 | henry | Assigned To | => henry |
| 2017-07-21 17:40 | henry | Status | new => resolved |
| 2017-07-21 17:40 | henry | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2017-07-21 17:40 | henry | Fixed in Version | => dev |
| 2017-07-21 17:40 | henry | Note Added: 0008432 | |
| 2018-07-10 11:23 | administrator | Tag Detached: thin-film model |
