View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0001687 | OpenFOAM | Bug | public | 2015-05-08 14:54 | 2015-05-24 18:59 |
| Reporter | Timm Severin | Assigned To | henry | ||
| Priority | low | Severity | text | Reproducibility | N/A |
| Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Platform | GNU/Linux | OS | Ubuntu | OS Version | 13.10 |
| Summary | 0001687: Wrong class description | ||||
| Description | In the files (all descriptions based on radiationCoupledBase.H): $FOAM_SRC/thermophysicalModels/radiationModels/derivedFvPatchFields/radiationCoupledBase/radiationCoupledBase.H $FOAM_SRC/thermophysicalModels/radiationModels/derivedFvPatchFields/greyDiffusiveRadiation/greyDiffusiveRadiationMixedFvPatchScalarField.H $FOAM_SRC/thermophysicalModels/radiationModels/derivedFvPatchFields/greyDiffusiveRadiation/greyDiffusiveViewFactorFixedValueFvPatchScalarField.H Description in header is wrong: The options for the emissivity are "lookup" and "solidRadiation", not solidThermo. Furthermore I think the descriptions are misleading, since (as far as I read the code) "lookup" does not read a volScalarField as such, but rather the value stored in the same dictionary under emissivity, i.e. a constant value (as in the example dictionaries shown). And the solidRadiation options seems to use the emissivity values obtained at a different, mapped boundary condition. The description "use solidThermo emissivity" does not really clarify that. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-05-08 14:54 | Timm Severin | New Issue | |
| 2015-05-24 18:59 | henry | Note Added: 0004790 | |
| 2015-05-24 18:59 | henry | Status | new => resolved |
| 2015-05-24 18:59 | henry | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2015-05-24 18:59 | henry | Assigned To | => henry |
