View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0001183 | OpenFOAM | Bug | public | 2014-02-25 02:15 | 2014-02-25 09:57 |
Reporter | Assigned To | henry | |||
Priority | normal | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always |
Status | resolved | Resolution | no change required | ||
Platform | Linux | OS | OpenSuse | OS Version | 11.3 |
Summary | 0001183: phiHbyA in pEqn.H of bouyantPimpleFoam | ||||
Description | According to report from Japanese user of me, "surfaceScalarField phiHbyA" seems to have issue. In the "pEqn.H", it is as follow. surfaceScalarField phiHbyA ( "phiHbyA", ( (fvc::interpolate(rho*U) & mesh.Sf()) + rAUf*fvc::ddtCorr(rho, U, phi) ) + phig ); But, Japanese user says that it should be as follow. surfaceScalarField phiHbyA ( "phiHbyA", ( (fvc::interpolate(rho*HbyA) & mesh.Sf()) + rAUf*fvc::ddtCorr(rho, U, phi) ) | ||||
Additional Information | For checking it, he compared original and modification "pEqn.H" by hotRoom. Here are residuals of these. You can see betterment on "p_rgh". | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
2014-02-25 02:15
|
|
|
It is not clear why Japanese user is suggenting the removal of the buoyancy term from the flux; this is an essential part of the algorithm. |
|
Sorry, I was confused by the missing phig and did not notice the change from U to HbyA. Resolved by commit b766ecd3f957d8d31643963a28a06bec7100081d |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2014-02-25 02:15 |
|
New Issue | |
2014-02-25 02:15 |
|
File Added: residual.zip | |
2014-02-25 08:30 | henry | Note Added: 0002893 | |
2014-02-25 08:30 | henry | Status | new => closed |
2014-02-25 08:30 | henry | Assigned To | => henry |
2014-02-25 08:30 | henry | Resolution | open => no change required |
2014-02-25 09:57 | henry | Note Added: 0002894 | |
2014-02-25 09:57 | henry | Status | closed => resolved |