View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0004107 | OpenFOAM | Bug | public | 2024-07-02 06:00 | 2024-07-02 09:50 |
| Reporter | scramjetFoam | Assigned To | henry | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | closed | Resolution | no change required | ||
| Platform | wsl2 | OS | Linux | OS Version | Ubuntu 22.04 |
| Product Version | dev | ||||
| Summary | 0004107: Each maxRefinement in multiple cellZones doesn't make sense when using AMR based on multiple refinementRegions? | ||||
| Description | When defining multiple refinementRegions and running AMR, the maxRefinement set for each cellZone controls the cellLevel? However the maximum value of maxRefinement is used, is this a bug or feature? In my attached test case, the refinementRegion1(x=(0,0.5)) grid should be encrypted once and the refinementRegion2(x=(0.5,1)) grid twice, but in fact both region grids are encrypted twice. | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce | ./Allrun | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
It is a design decision: label maxRefinement = 0; if (dict_.isDict("refinementRegions")) { const dictionary& refinementRegions ( dict_.subDict("refinementRegions") ); forAllConstIter(dictionary, refinementRegions, iter) { maxRefinement = max ( selectRefineCandidates ( refineCells, refinementRegions.subDict(iter().keyword()) ), maxRefinement ); } } else { maxRefinement = selectRefineCandidates(refineCells, dict_); } |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-02 06:00 | scramjetFoam | New Issue | |
| 2024-07-02 06:00 | scramjetFoam | File Added: damBreak3D_test.zip | |
| 2024-07-02 09:50 | henry | Assigned To | => henry |
| 2024-07-02 09:50 | henry | Status | new => closed |
| 2024-07-02 09:50 | henry | Resolution | open => no change required |
| 2024-07-02 09:50 | henry | Note Added: 0013296 |
