View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0002533 | OpenFOAM | Bug | public | 2017-04-28 13:49 | 2017-04-28 14:23 |
Reporter | shildenbrand | Assigned To | henry | ||
Priority | urgent | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always |
Status | closed | Resolution | no change required | ||
Platform | HP Z640 | OS | Debian | OS Version | 8.7 |
Product Version | dev | ||||
Fixed in Version | dev | ||||
Summary | 0002533: Cases with (new) particle tracking cannot be postprocessed with Paraview | ||||
Description | Paraview can not read the new particle "positions" format. This happens in both cases, when using the Paraview native OpenFOAM reader as well as the Reader provided by OpenFOAM. Old format was for example (0.02641281071 -0.02402617481 0.02936163623) 4235 New format is (0.1674858034 0.4225662228 0.4064526504 0.00349532343) 34844 100245 2 Error message (in case of *.OpenFOAM) is: --> FOAM FATAL IO ERROR: Expected a ')' while reading VectorSpace<Form, Cmpt, Ncmpts>, found on line 20 the doubleScalar 0.00349532343 file: /scratch/pc-cae3/shildenbrand/OpenFOAM/run/99_tutorials/lagrangian/reactingParcelFoam/verticalChannel/0.02/lagrangian/reactingCloud1/positions at line 20. From function Foam::Istream& Foam::Istream::readEnd(const char*) in file db/IOstreams/IOstreams/Istream.C at line 109. FOAM exiting | ||||
Steps To Reproduce | Run tutorial lagrangian/reactingParcelFoam/verticalChannel After Time = 0.02 there are particles present. | ||||
Tags | Lagrangian | ||||
|
I cannot reproduce this issue, the ParaFoam reader uses the Lagrangian library to read the data so should be fully consistent. Note: The particle positions file now contains particles' local coordinates and topology, rather than the global coordinates and cell. This change to the output format is not backwards compatible. Existing cases with Lagrangian data will not restart, but they will still run from time zero without any modification. This change was necessary in order to guarantee that the loaded particle is valid, and therefore fundamentally prevent "loss" and "search-failure" type bugs (e.g., 2517, 2442, 2286, 1836, 1461, 1341, 1097). |
|
You are right. Sorry for the report - somehow the compilation of PVReaders has not worked. Starting with Paraview 5.3 this will lead to a problem in the current configuration, however. Please close the report. |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2017-04-28 13:49 | shildenbrand | New Issue | |
2017-04-28 13:49 | shildenbrand | Tag Attached: Lagrangian | |
2017-04-28 14:00 | henry | Note Added: 0008052 | |
2017-04-28 14:13 | shildenbrand | Note Added: 0008053 | |
2017-04-28 14:23 | henry | Assigned To | => henry |
2017-04-28 14:23 | henry | Status | new => closed |
2017-04-28 14:23 | henry | Resolution | open => no change required |
2017-04-28 14:23 | henry | Fixed in Version | => dev |